🌐 OpenBrowserClaw vs OpenClaw 🦞

Side-by-side comparison of OpenBrowserClaw and OpenClaw — two projects in the OpenClaw ecosystem.

Executive Summary

OpenClaw is the more established choice by community size, while OpenBrowserClaw is the more niche option for teams that care about its specific design tradeoffs.

Use the score table for the hard numbers, then use the decision notes below to figure out which tradeoffs matter for your team.

Choose OpenBrowserClaw If...

  • + You prefer a browser-native experience over a server-heavy runtime.
  • + Its positioning around browser and lightweight is closer to what you need.

Choose OpenClaw If...

  • + You want the larger community footprint and stronger proof of adoption in the market.
  • + MCP connectivity matters for your workflow and you want a tool-friendly integration model.
  • + Maintenance signals look stronger right now, with healthier release and commit activity.
Stars
★ 585
★ 339k
7d Growth
+7
+9.0k
Forks
80
67k
Open Issues
9
16k
Language
TypeScript
TypeScript
Categories
browser, lightweight, minimal
reference, self-hosted
Platform
Browser, Messaging
Server
LLM Required
Yes
Yes
MCP Support
No
Yes
Integrations
License
MIT
MIT
Last Commit
30d ago
0d ago
Latest Release
v2026.3.24
Health Score
55/100
85/100
Leaderboard Rank
#30 of 54
#1 of 54

Key Differences

  • OpenClaw has 580x more stars (339k vs 585), indicating significantly broader adoption.
  • OpenClaw is growing faster with +9.0k stars this week vs +7 for OpenBrowserClaw.
  • OpenClaw was updated today, while OpenBrowserClaw's last commit was 30 days ago.
  • OpenBrowserClaw runs in the browser while OpenClaw requires a server.
  • OpenClaw has MCP (Model Context Protocol) support while OpenBrowserClaw does not.
  • OpenBrowserClaw focuses on browser, lightweight, minimal while OpenClaw targets reference, self-hosted.

Which should you choose?

Both OpenBrowserClaw and OpenClaw are part of the OpenClaw ecosystem of personal AI agent frameworks. Your choice depends on your priorities — community size, language preference, project maturity, and specific feature focus.

If you want the most battle-tested option with the largest community, OpenClaw is the clear choice with 339k stars and a mature ecosystem. However, OpenBrowserClaw may be worth considering if you need its focus on browser or prefer TypeScript.

Ultimately, the best choice depends on your specific use case. Check out each project's page for detailed stats and links to their repositories.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is OpenBrowserClaw or OpenClaw more popular?
OpenClaw currently has 339k GitHub stars compared to 585 for OpenBrowserClaw. In the last 7 days, OpenClaw gained more stars (+9.0k).
What language are OpenBrowserClaw and OpenClaw written in?
Both OpenBrowserClaw and OpenClaw are written in TypeScript. This means they share similar deployment requirements and can potentially reuse plugins or extensions.
Does OpenBrowserClaw or OpenClaw support MCP?
OpenClaw supports the Model Context Protocol (MCP) for connecting to external tools, while OpenBrowserClaw does not currently offer MCP support.

Related Comparisons