🦞 OpenClaw vs Poco Agent 🎨

Side-by-side comparison of OpenClaw and Poco Agent — two projects in the OpenClaw ecosystem.

Executive Summary

OpenClaw is the more established choice by community size, while Poco Agent is the more niche option for teams that care about its specific design tradeoffs.

Use the score table for the hard numbers, then use the decision notes below to figure out which tradeoffs matter for your team.

🦞 OpenClaw

OpenClaw momentum

+1.9k7.0x ecosystem avg

2026-04-07 to 2026-05-06

🎨 Poco Agent

Poco Agent momentum

+31% of avg

2026-04-07 to 2026-05-06

Choose OpenClaw If...

  • + You want the larger community footprint and stronger proof of adoption in the market.
  • + MCP connectivity matters for your workflow and you want a tool-friendly integration model.
  • + Maintenance signals look stronger right now, with healthier release and commit activity.

Choose Poco Agent If...

  • + Its positioning around self-hosted and messaging is closer to what you need.
Stars
★ 369k
★ 1.3k
7d Growth
+1.9k
+3
Forks
76k
121
Open Issues
7.3k
1
Language
TypeScript
TypeScript
Categories
reference, self-hosted
self-hosted, messaging
Platform
Server
Server
LLM Required
Yes
Yes
MCP Support
Yes
No
Integrations
License
MIT
MIT
Last Commit
0d ago
1d ago
Latest Release
v2026.5.6
v0.4.0
Health Score
95/100
75/100
Leaderboard Rank
#1 of 54
#23 of 54

Key Differences

  • OpenClaw has 283x more stars (369k vs 1.3k), indicating significantly broader adoption.
  • OpenClaw is growing faster with +1.9k stars this week vs +3 for Poco Agent.
  • OpenClaw has a higher fork-to-star ratio (21% vs 9%), suggesting more active contributor participation.
  • OpenClaw has MCP (Model Context Protocol) support while Poco Agent does not.
  • OpenClaw focuses on reference while Poco Agent targets messaging.
  • OpenClaw scores higher on project health (maintenance activity, issue management, release cadence).

Which should you choose?

Both OpenClaw and Poco Agent are part of the OpenClaw ecosystem of personal AI agent frameworks. Your choice depends on your priorities — community size, language preference, project maturity, and specific feature focus.

If you want the most battle-tested option with the largest community, OpenClaw is the clear choice with 369k stars and a mature ecosystem. However, Poco Agent may be worth considering if you need its focus on self-hosted or prefer TypeScript.

Ultimately, the best choice depends on your specific use case. Check out each project's page for detailed stats and links to their repositories.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is OpenClaw or Poco Agent more popular?
OpenClaw currently has 369k GitHub stars compared to 1.3k for Poco Agent. In the last 7 days, OpenClaw gained more stars (+1.9k).
What language are OpenClaw and Poco Agent written in?
Both OpenClaw and Poco Agent are written in TypeScript. This means they share similar deployment requirements and can potentially reuse plugins or extensions.
Does OpenClaw or Poco Agent support MCP?
OpenClaw supports the Model Context Protocol (MCP) for connecting to external tools, while Poco Agent does not currently offer MCP support.

Related Comparisons