# OpenClaw vs OpenMozi

> Side-by-side comparison of two projects in the OpenClaw ecosystem.

Canonical HTML: https://shelldex.com/compare/openclaw-vs-openmozi/
JSON: https://shelldex.com/api/compare/openclaw-vs-openmozi.json

| Field | OpenClaw | OpenMozi |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | The OG self-hosted AI super-agent | Lightweight OpenClaw for China's app ecosystem |
| Language | typescript | typescript |
| Status | active | active |
| Stars | 369k | 180 |
| Forks | 76104 | 27 |
| Open issues | 7307 | 15 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last commit | 2026-05-06T19:42:42Z | 2026-03-18T14:06:58Z |
| 7d growth | 1935 | 0 |
| MCP support | yes | no |
| Requires LLM | yes | yes |
| Platforms | server | server, messaging |
| Categories | reference, self-hosted | multi-platform, self-hosted, chinese-ecosystem |
| Health score | 95/100 | 15/100 |
| Leaderboard rank | #1 | #43 |

## Key differences

- OpenClaw has 2050x more stars (369k vs 180), indicating significantly broader adoption.
- OpenClaw is growing faster with +1.9k stars this week vs +0 for OpenMozi.
- OpenClaw was updated today, while OpenMozi's last commit was 49 days ago.
- OpenClaw uses the MIT license while OpenMozi uses Apache-2.0.
- OpenClaw has MCP (Model Context Protocol) support while OpenMozi does not.
- OpenClaw focuses on reference while OpenMozi targets multi-platform, chinese-ecosystem.

## Descriptions

### OpenClaw

The original. Self-hosted AI super-agent platform. Formerly Clawdbot, then Moltbot. The project that started it all.

### OpenMozi

A lightweight AI assistant framework focused on Chinese platforms. Supports QQ, Feishu, DingTalk, and WeCom channels with native Chinese LLM providers (DeepSeek, Doubao, Qwen, Kimi, Zhipu). 3% of OpenClaw's codebase with core functionality intact.