# IronClaw vs Secure-OpenClaw

> Side-by-side comparison of two projects in the OpenClaw ecosystem.

Canonical HTML: https://shelldex.com/compare/ironclaw-vs-secure-openclaw/
JSON: https://shelldex.com/api/compare/ironclaw-vs-secure-openclaw.json

| Field | IronClaw | Secure-OpenClaw |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Rust-hardened privacy fortress | Security-hardened OpenClaw by Composio |
| Language | rust | typescript |
| Status | active | active |
| Stars | 12k | 1.2k |
| Forks | 1424 | 168 |
| Open issues | 925 | 4 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last commit | 2026-05-15T16:49:45Z | 2026-05-08T01:24:30Z |
| 7d growth | 106 | -2 |
| MCP support | no | yes |
| Requires LLM | yes | yes |
| Platforms | server | server, messaging |
| Categories | privacy, security | security, messaging |
| Health score | 75/100 | 60/100 |
| Leaderboard rank | #13 | #25 |

## Key differences

- IronClaw has 10x more stars (12k vs 1.2k), indicating significantly broader adoption.
- IronClaw is growing faster with +106 stars this week vs +-2 for Secure-OpenClaw.
- IronClaw is written in Rust while Secure-OpenClaw uses TypeScript, which may influence your choice depending on your stack.
- IronClaw uses the Apache-2.0 license while Secure-OpenClaw uses MIT.
- Secure-OpenClaw has MCP (Model Context Protocol) support while IronClaw does not.
- Secure-OpenClaw advertises 500+ built-in integrations.

## Descriptions

### IronClaw

Rust implementation focused on privacy and security. When your agent needs armor plating.

### Secure-OpenClaw

24/7 AI assistant on WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal, iMessage with full tool access, persistent memory, and 500+ app integrations